IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN RANAH AFEKTIF PADA PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA MI/SD

Lilis Sumaryanti* -  Univeritas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Nuraini Nuraini -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
Ayu Wulansari -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Usaid Abana -  universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Tina Utari -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/tarbawi.v1i2.2789

Assessment standards according to Permendikbud No.66/2013 explain that in the 2013 curriculum there are assessment techniques and tools including assessment of attitudes, knowledge and skills aspects. Development of student competence in learning and assessment includes affective, cognitive and psychomotor aspects. In the assessment, the teachers give an attitude value that is appropriate for students to carry out and just to understand students. The results of this study state that aspects of affective assessment in the 2013 curriculum include attitude evaluation consisting of 1) observational assessment by observing students inside and outside the classroom during the Indonesian language learning process; 2) self-assessment is carried out during questions and answers with students; 3) peer-to-peer assessment by conducting positive assessments between students; 4) journal assessment is done by looking at attitudes and student learning outcomes in Indonesian subjects.

Keywords
Affective Assessment, Indonesian Language Learning
  1. Agusta, Thomas, and Wirdati Wirdati. “Implementasi Penilaian Afektif Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI.” An-Nuha 2, no. 2 (2022): 279–88. https://doi.org/10.24036/annuha.v2i2.182.
  2. Dubey, Umesh Kumar Bhayyalal, and D. P. Kothari. Research Methodology. Research Methodology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315167138.
  3. Farhrohman, Oman. “Implementasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di SD/MI.” Primary: Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Dasar 9, no. 1 (2017): 23–34. http://www.jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/primary/article/view/412.
  4. Fatmawati, and Yusrizal. “Analysis of the Utilization of Nature as a Learning Media in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal) : Humanities 4, no. 4 (2021): 8150–54.
  5. Fatmawati, and Yuzrizal. “Peran Kurikulum Akhlak Dalam Pembentukan Karakter Di Sekolah Alam Sou Parung Bogor.” Tematik Universitas Negeri Medan 11, no. 1 (2020): 26–36.
  6. Firman, Harry, and Karomah Khilda. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Diri Dan Penilaian Teman-Sejawat Untuk Menilai Kinerja.” Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia: Kajian Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia 4, no. 2 (2017): 111–18.
  7. Firyomanto, Hari Wibawanto, Rodia Syamwil. “PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA Guru Menggunakan Penilaian Diri, Teman Sejawat, Dan Penilaian Oleh Siswa” 5, no. 1 (2016): 32–40.
  8. Gusti, Ade Rahma, Yesy Afriansari, Della Verta Sari, and Ahmad Walid. “Penilaian Afektif Pembelajaran Daring IPA Terpadu Dengan Menggunakan Media Whatsapp.” Diffraction 2, no. 2 (2021): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v2i2.2411.
  9. Gustina, Gustina. “Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Puisi Dengan Menggunakan Model Experiential Learning Pada Siswa Kelas Iii Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK) 1, no. 1 (2019): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v1i1.337.
  10. Hasanah, Hasyim. “Teknik-Teknik Observasi” 8, no. 1 (2017): 21. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v8i1.1163.
  11. Hasanah, Uswatun. “Sistem Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Penilaian Afektif Menggunakan Google Classroom Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia.” Kode : Jurnal Bahasa 10, no. 4 (2021): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v10i4.30736.John W. Creswell. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. 4th ed. Vol. 4. Los Angles: SAGE, 2014.
  12. Mansyur, Umar. “Inovasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Proses.” Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 9, no. 2 (2016): 158–63. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v9i2.3806.
  13. Mohzana, Hary Nurcahyanto, Muh. Fahrurrozi. “Kemampuan Guru Dalam Menilai Aspek Afektif.” Joeai (Journal of Education and Intruction) 4, no. 1 (2021): 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2150.
  14. Saftari, Maya, and Nurul Fajriah. “Penilaian Ranah Afektif Dalam Bentuk Penilaian Skala Sikap Untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar.” Edutainment : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan 7, no. 1 (2019): 71–81. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v7i1.164.
  15. Sukanti, Sukanti. “Penilaian Afektif Dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia 9, no. 1 (2011): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v9i1.960.
  16. Unun Pratiwi, Veronika, Apri Pendri, and Dina Komalasari. “Menggunakan Media Audiovisual Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar” 9, no. 1 (2021): 30–37.
  17. Yuliani, Wiwin. “Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif Dalam Perspektif Bimbingan Dan Konseling” 2, no. 2 (2018): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497.
  18. Yulianti, Winda Cahya Wati, and Adiyono. “Analisis Standar Hasil Evaluasi Melalui Proses Belajar.” SOKO GURU: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 2, no. 2 (2022): 170–76. https://doi.org/10.55606/sokoguru.v2i2.815.
  19. Zaini, Herman. “Karakteristik Kurikulum 2013 Dan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Ktsp).” El-Idare: Journal of Islamic Education Management 1, no. 01 (2015): 15–31.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-07-12
Published: 2024-07-16
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: