Analisis Framing Model Robert N. Entman Tentang Berita Kasus Pria Dibakar Hidup-Hidup di Bekasi Pada Liputan6.com Edisi 4 Agustus 2017

Khoirul Anwar -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Krisna Megantari -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Niken Lestarini* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia

This study used descriptive qualitative method. The background of the problem emerged from the Liputan6.com report about the case of the burning of the man who stole the amplifier in the prayer room, the victim named M. Al-Zahra, a resident of Kampung Jati, North Cikarang, Bekasi Regency. The researcher determined the purpose of the study to determine the framing and selection of the issue of highlighting the Liputan6.com reality aspect in the case news, through Robert N. Entman's framing analysis technique. From the data analysis, the author concludes the Liputan6.com Define Problems frame. The victim's family denies any allegations of theft committed by the victim, Diagnose Causes The victim was persecuted and burned by residents on charges of stealing the mushala amplifier, Make Moral Judgment M. Al-Zahra or Joya was the victim of the wrong target. , Treatment Recommendation The police are required to immediately resolve the case in accordance with applicable law, by selecting the issue about the perpetrator or actor of the persecution and arson of the victim, while the highlight of the reality aspect is the background of the victim's work as an amplifier repairman. By obscuring the issue of perpetrators of torture and arson, plus highlighting the aspect of reality that emphasizes the victim's job as a loudspeaker repairman, the public pays more attention to Liputan6.com's frame about accusations and victims being misdirected.

Keywords
FRAMING, MEN BURNED, LIPUTAN6.COM
  1. Budyatna, Muhammad. 2006. Jurnalistik Teori dan Praktik. PT. Remaja
  2. Rosdakarya. Bandung.
  3. Bungin, Burhan. 2009. Penelitian Kualitatif : Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan
  4. Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta
  5. Chesney, Robert, MC. 1998. Media Massa Ancaman Terhadap Demokrasi. AJI. Jakarta.
  6. Effendy, Onong, Uchjana. 1993. Ilmu Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. PT.Citra
  7. Aditya Bakti. Bandung.
  8. _ _ _ _ _ _ . 2013. Ilmu Komunikasi : Teori dan Praktek. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  9. Bandung.
  10. Eriyanto. 2002. Analisis Framing : Kontruksi Ideologi, dan Politik Media. Lkis.
  11. Yogyakarta.
  12. _ _ _ _ _ . 2012. Analisis Framing : Kontruksi Ideologi, dan Politik Media. Lkis.
  13. Yogyakarta.
  14. Kovach, Bill, dan Resenstiel, Tom. 2005. Sembilan Elemen Jurnalisme. Yayasan
  15. Pantau. Jakarta.
  16. Nurudin. 2007. Pengantar Komunikasi Massa. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta
  17. Pareno, Sam, Abede. 2005. Media Massa : Antara Realitas dan Mimpi. Papyrus. Jakarta.
  18. Santana, Septiawan, K. 2005. Jurnalisme Kontemporer. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  19. Jakarta.
  20. Severin, Werner, J, dan Tankard, James, W, Jr. 2005. Teori Komunikasi : Sejarah,
  21. Metode. Dan Terapan Di Dalam Media Massa. Prenada Media. Jakarta.
  22. Shoemaker, Pamela, J, dan Reese, Stephen, D. 1996. Mediating The Message:
  23. Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content 2nd Ed. Longman Publisher. New York.
  24. Sobur, Alex. 2012. Analisis Teks Media : Suatu Pengantar Untuk Analisis
  25. Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. PT.Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
  26. Sumber Lain :
  27. www.m.liputan6.com/latest

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2022-09-08
Published: 2018-04-01
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: